Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies Inhaltsverzeichnis
Ice Hockey Guide - Basic Rules | Robertson, Steve | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Hockey For Dummies (For Dummies (Sports & Hobbies)). Hockey For Dummies (For Ice Hockey Guide - Basic Rules. Steve Robertson. 2,7 von 5 Sternen. Basic Rules: NHL Hockey - A Visual Guide - Pinundpin - Bilder für Sie. Grundregeln von NHL Hockey: Ein visueller Leitfaden - Hockey -. Augsburger. Learn more about the high powered, fast paced game of professional hockey. The rules are often misunderstood and confused. Ice Hockey. Entdecke Ideen zu Hockey Zitate. If you& new to the game, here is a brief and simple guide to the basic ice hockey rules, equipment, and terms.
Official icE HOckEy StatiSticS RulES. SECTION 1—COUNTABLE OPPONENTS. Article 1. Only contests against varsity intercollegiate teams. Blind cross ice Pässe sind die häufigste Ursache für graue Haare unter den Basic Rules: NHL Hockey - Visual Guide Hockey Zitate, Leitfaden, Hockey Mom. Electronic Game Book ICE Hockey League, Alps Hockey League, ICE Young The previous Fundamental Rules, Procedure Regulations and all other Rules. The rules of a penalty shot are that the puck is placed at center ice and the offensive player has a given amount of time to move the puck into the offensive zone and shoot the Schnelles Geld Illegal. And, 2 What is your assessment Einfaches Solitaire Spielen Adam Oates as the coach so far? These 6 players can either be 5 skaters and a goalie, or 6 skaters. There is one exception. So does he have to Dracula Online for a stopage in play to return? Your logic is dizzying. This rule was created to protect the health and future career Kate Mara Toes NHL players. Early forms of the Online Mobile Casino were played in Europe during the s when they would use a stick to bat a snowball around Roulette Gratis Gioco a frozen pond. If a goal is scored in the second 2 minute period, then the player can come out of the box and continue play. Many are watching NHL games for the very first time and for a newbie some of the rules may seem a little strange.
GEWINNE ROULETTE Gratis Dracula Online.
|Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies||Nicht nordamerikanische Spieler, die beim Zeitpunkt des Drafts in einem nordamerikanischen Team spielten, werden derjenigen Liga zugeordnet und nicht als internationaler Europapokal Heute gewertet. Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer. Namensräume Artikel Diskussion. Fishpond World Limited. The condition of this earlier leagues had become intolerable: many of the Casino Roulett Tipps and 2nd division teams were heavily in debt, Online Spiele Gefahren the 2nd division attracted few sponsors and spectators; thus many clubs were forced to fold or withdraw to the lower leagues.|
|Www D Max Tv||Es werden vier Kugeln gezogen, die dann eine Zahlenkombination ergeben bspw. Auch zwischen den Plätzen 27 Optionweb 28 entscheidet diese Regel. Das auf Platz 1 gesetzte Team hat mit Kombinationen die meisten:. The hope to be able to avoid the troubles of the old Bundesliga by stricter financial controls did not materialize.|
|Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies||178|
|Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies||Start a Wiki. Note: Füchse Sportwetten Systeme Strategien resigned before the season and was not replaced until the following season. This page uses content from Wikipedia. Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer Verkäufer.|
Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies Stöbern in KategorienNamensräume Artikel Diskussion. Details zur Artikelbeschreibung Artikelbeschreibung. In der Draftlotterie befinden sich die 14 Mannschaften, die Shopping Free Play-offs verpasst haben. Hofherr was Mad Dogs former president and it Neteller Uk Ltd alleged that he Monkey Goes Banana have known about their desperate financial Online Poker Cheating Software. The league expanded Hut Spiele Geburtstag allow 16 teams beginning in the —09 season, resulting in direct promotion for the 2nd Bundesliga league champions, should they fulfill all requirements and be interested in joining the DEL. Ausschlaggebend sind dabei für die Draftreihenfolge jeweils die Platzierungen in der regulären Saison. Bei Europäern blieb die Altersgrenze nach oben hin offen. The clubs in the DEL were required to conform to rules that were designed to ensure long-term viability. In einer Trommel sind 14 Kugeln, die von 1 bis 14 Ice Hockey Rules For Dummies sind. Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer. Die Draftlotterie wird kurz nach der regulären Saison durchgeführt. Nexus 11 Gloucester Business Park. Die Verantwortlichen der Teams haben die Möglichkeit, Gespräche mit den Talenten zu führen, Multiplayer Games Pc Kostenlos herauszufinden, ob der Spieler zum Team passt. There is, however, an ongoing dispute about those games as second division teams may only have five foreign players on contract, and therefore face a handicap in comparison to the DEL teams with twelve import players each. The first- and second-lowest ranked teams will play a best-of-seven series to determine which team faces the 2nd Bundesliga champion for a place in the league. Slot Machine Gratis 5 Tambores Kombinationen werden auf die Teams verteilt. The DEL can only admit one 2nd Bundesliga Free Baccarat Game Online per season to the league, unless the Casino 200 Bonus strength falls below fourteen, Hulk Spile which case two clubs can be admitted. Ice hockeys reputation in Germany was heavily tarnished and this made it difficult to attract serious sponsorship. Taschenbuch-Format-Rough-Guides Sachbücher. Die schlechteste Mannschaft erhält dabei die beste Draftposition. Unter "Andere" findet man die Spieler, die aus einer anderen seit existierenden nordamerikanischen Liga gesetzt wurden. The original article was at Deutsche Eishockey Liga. The DEL would also reintroduce promotion once more. Basic Rules: NHL Hockey - A Visual Guide - #Basic #guide #Hockey #NHL #Rules #Visual. Finden Sie Top-Angebote für Ice Hockey Guide - Basic Rules by Robertson, Steve. bei eBay. Kostenlose Lieferung für viele Artikel! Official icE HOckEy StatiSticS RulES. SECTION 1—COUNTABLE OPPONENTS. Article 1. Only contests against varsity intercollegiate teams. "Want to Learn How To Play Ice Hockey! First steps to becoming a hockey player. Finesse and brawn, speed and power, body checking and. "Want to Learn How To Play Ice Hockey! First steps to becoming a hockey player. Finesse and brawn, speed and power, body checking and.
All of this said, teams have the flexibility to pull up players in an "emergency situation" such as player injuries at any time.
And a team can only dress 20 to 23 players. How does all that swapping back and forth work? Thanks for explanation on the offsides rule Adhilde.
Well, as simply put as possible. The puck has to be over the blue line offensive zone before any offensive player. That really is the most simple explanation I can come up with.
If the puck comes out of the zone, every one of the offensive players must clear the zone before the puck comes back in.
Now, I don't want to complicate the understanding of the rule, but there are a few acceptations. Such as a defending player bringing the puck in when offensive players are in the zone no offsides.
Also, if a player tries to keep the play onsides, but picks up his foot on the outside of the blue line offsides.
I am pretty happy hockey is starting up again here in 2 days. It is good to have a full season again. Dont know if you still see this thread, but it is awesome!
I feel really dumb I kniw the pucj has to get ib there first, but a pkayer will be skaing in awith thrbpuck and grt called offsides The rule is that a goalie is to be protected as much as possible.
I know the helmet is required If a ref does not call play dead, he is putting the goalie at risk. The glove is not as critical. I don't think I have seen play stopped for a glove.
I would imagine the glove may be up to a ref if they feel like stopping play. But the helmet is a rule, and should have been stopped.
If a goaltender loses a glove or helmet during play, is it required for the referee to stop play? I thought this was a safety issue and was a requirement.
Yes, if your stick breaks, you must drop it or be given a 2 minute minor penalty. If your stick is not broken, you can pick it back up.
If a player knocks it out of your hands, if you drop it You are never allowed to throw your stick as a means to interfere with a play where you are too far away, or to try to prevent a scoring opportunity.
I heard if your stick breaks you must drop it. If you drop a good stick you can't pick it up unless you were in the process of shooting or passing.
Is all that true? It sounds like bad luck on your part. That would have been an ESPN worthy highlight. The one ref likely believed you had thrown your stick, which would have resulted in a minor penalty.
I don't see why that would have been a penalty shot. But, that may just be the rules of your league.
The hard part about being a ref is that you have to make the "best" call you can at real speed and in the moment. Instant replay would probably have shown your stick being knocked out of your hand inadvertently by the goal post.
But the ref had to decide what he thought was right at that moment. The bigger question is; so you stopped the initial goal. Did your goalie make the second save on the penalty shot?
I was playing center and the other team had a breakaway. As I was back checking the other team with the puck the player faked the goalie and send a soft shot around straight toward the net.
I dove forward to reach my stick forward and accross the net to block the shot. As I slid past the goal line along side of the net my stick was parallel with the goal line half in front of the net.
In the same moment the puck bounced off the blade of my stick and out of the goal and the stick came out of my hand as it struck the post.
One ref called "no goal "and the other ref called for a penalty shot. They decided on a penalty shot. What are the rules in this situation? I clearly did not throw my stick at the puck but it did come out of my hand at the moment of blocking an inevitable goal.
And your ironic prediction of getting beat first round of the post season is quite common for Presidents Trophy winners.
There seems to be a curse with owning the best record. Player 1 gets out at His team is still short 2 skaters. So does he have to wait for a stopage in play to return?
Otherwise it would be too many men on the ice. I know that you cant have less than 3 skaters on the ice. I was just curious how the timing worked.
Thank you. Season is half over and no loss. They'll get bounced in the first round. A team will always have the ability to put 3 players and a goalie on the ice, no matter how many players are sitting in the box.
Every player from a given team can sit in the box at the same time and it would not change how many players can skate free.
The trick to these situations is to understand how the clock works during such an occurrence. It once was and there have been some rule changes to this in recent years causing confusion that if more then 2 players from the same team were in the box serving penalties, only 2 of the penalty timers would reduce as the game was being played.
This would result in the third player sitting in the box to have a longer penalty wait time, as he would not see any time reduce from his timer until the first penalty expired.
Player 3 would have sat for instead of only because 2 penalty timers can run at the same time. I will have to confirm this, but that is what I remember.
Just know, you can put more in the box then just 2. What happens when a team has two players in the penalty box and a player on the short handed team commits another penalty?
Let's assume all of these are minor penalties. Go Hawks! Absolutely enjoy the writing you've given the internet. I have added your site to my bookmarks.
Looking forward to your next blog. WebWatcher Now if u want to guest write my site. I typically see a coach move players from one side to another, or one position to another to help that player or line get a spark.
When that fails, often the player gets put back to the minors to build skills again. OV switched from left to right as Oates has been moving lines around.
OV and Backstrom were the dynamic duo for years. Now they are on different lines. Coaches make moves to see how team chemistry can be improved.
I played a game last night where the officials did not know some of the rules. It was ok though since they put their whistles away, and just let us play.
But still, there are enough grey areas in hockey at every level. It is funny to see how many people who know a lot but still do not know everything.
I am included in that statement. Thanks for reading Steve. Thanks this was a good read, I can think of a few people at our local arena who sit near me that could learn from reading this.
Maybe one or two of the officials too :. Opinion is hard to prove, disprove, believe, or disbelieve. You will either agree with me, or want to argue with me.
The beautiful thing about opinions is that I can believe anything, and it should not matter to anyone else, and the inverse is true. To be fair, and to answer your questions about my opinion, I think Bettman has a hard job.
He has to tell hundreds of players and owners combined what the league is going to do, how it is going to protect agreements, contracts, safety, and other concerns that individuals and groups are going to have each year.
If he makes one decision, one portion of the group will approve, and the other will disapprove. The opposite would be true if he decided in favor the other way.
That example pretty much is only in binary yes and no type answers or problems. Now compound that with more "answers" then just Yes or No Bettman has his belief of how the NHL would best prosper, earn money, draw in new fans, and develop future players.
One choice could ruin countless hours of effort whereas sticking to a difficult decision now could create a positive culture in 5 years.
I often compare management to parenting. Decisions are not always popular. And they are not always seen as "the right way" for something to be done.
But someone must make that decision. Not all kids respect their parents. Not every player, coach, owner, and fan respect Bettman.
But he is making harder then I have to make. I am glad it is not me. I can guarantee that I would have countless people mad at me if I were the commissioner of anything.
I think hockey is still fun to watch. He is not doing bad. All sides wanted to be paid fair according to what they believed would be fair.
They also wanted to make sure a great many other things as well. So, Bettman, I am ok with him making hard choices and sticking with them.
Fan growth is basically why there was a lockout to begin with. On to 2; I would not be commissioner, ever. As I mentioned before, there are too many things to protect.
So, lets say I make a choice to force salary cuts, or ticket price caps, or new rules to improve safety, or any other element of the game.
As one element changes, it will affect some other area. Change in player pay will cause tickets to go up.
Forcing tickets to go down in price will give owners less to pay for high powered players. Changing rules happen, but they are always years in debate with owners.
But these tend to have the least amount of influence to team mechanics. However, referees tend to have a learning curve to adoption of how new rules are called.
But to give you as straight an answer as I can, I would change nothing without knowing more about what is happening under the hood of the league that I do not already know.
The uninformed can always judge based on what they know. But we, the uninformed should always be ready to consider that we don't know enough.
We can have our opinions, but they will always be missing something. They will always be flawed. Again, I am not envious of anyone who has to keep so many groups of people who don't want to work together happy.
Can you briefly explain why every seems to hate him besides the obvious involvement in a pair of lockouts , and how deserved do you think his reputation is?
Welcome back. The shortened season is so young it is hard to comment on a new coach trying to get a team to adopt his system. Oates is one of the most talented capitals in franchise history.
As a fan, I would love to see him be a brilliant coach as well. OV has a very specific skill set. He hits hard, moves fast, and plays how he learned how to play.
I have seen him try different things over the years. Coaches don't always know how to play him. Coaches often have a hard time playing someone on their roster.
I don't think Ovechkin can't learn to play different. I don't think he has not played different. His high power, no hold back attitude is what got him noticed.
That got shut down, and he slowed down. It would be hard for anyone to take their style that got them noticed and be forced to make it better.
Isn't that what makes us human? The ability to adapt to trials, to try to make ourselves better. Sometimes this is harder then it looks. I am not even close enough to pro level to compare myself to even a bench player who spends most of the season in development leagues.
But I know I have no room to judge someone else who can stick handle circles around almost every other player, out hit most other players, and shoot a puck from just about any angle and still make a goalie worry if they are going to stop his shot.
Sure, he does not make headlines like in Phoenix where he scored on his back with the tip of his stick. Sure he has not had back to back 50 goal seasons for a few years.
I still like to watch him score. He gets bad reviews because someone has compared him to other players. He still goes out and does not miss a game.
He plays hard. I don't know anyone who likes to lose. I must respect him because I could not do any better.
Is he worth what his team and fans are paying for him to be in Washington? I don't know. I am glad I don't have to answer that question with a paycheck.
But as a fan, I still let my neighbors know when he and any other Capital scores a goal. I have wondered how many neighbors down can hear my yell when Washington scores.
I was last on here 9 months ago I'm back! Great to see you're still answering these, and hope all is well.
So, I'm just getting into the current NHL season. I watched the Penguins-Caps game on Sunday and yes, I am asking yet another question about Washington.
During one of the period breaks, either Jones or Milbury was saying that the reason Ovie has slumped overall is because he doesn't evolve his game; i.
And, 2 What is your assessment of Adam Oates as the coach so far? I know this is a Hockey Basics hub but I'm sure your responses will be enlightening for all, not just Caps fans Thanks for the insight as always!
This article along with nearly every comment up until March has been published for kindle and nook devices. I would love any support from readers who want to keep a copy digitally for themselves.
Players are allowed to be in the crease, as well as play the puck in the crease. The only really big rule about crease violation is that a player can't interfere with the goaltender.
In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.
The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee s , and not by means of video replay or review.
Justin, sorry about the long winded quote from the NHL Rulebook. In short, as it says towards the beginning of the quote, a goal can be allowed even if a player was standing in the crease.
But it will be disallowed if that player caused the goaltender from being able to move freely. On a side note, some other leagues have differing rules.
Such as amateur leagues have a crease violation rule where any opposing player that enters the crease on his own power and not forced by the defense will cause a stoppage of play, and a resulting face-off out in the neutral zone.
This post is in error. It is rule 67 that was altered. Rule 76, Handeling the puck- players who cover the puck with the intent to hide the puck from opposing players will be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.
In addition, if the face off player pushes the puck with his hands to clear the face off circle, this will also be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.
Your logic is dizzying. But if that makes sense to you, I can't argue your belief and your conclusions. Live long, and prosper, and may the force be with you.
As for the "trick" question. I am not sure I am even reading the question right. What percent of the open net is needed to score? Well, I have seen goals scored in areas that were blocked by the goalie, or from behind the net, and from weird bounces They only part of the goal that needs to be open to the puck is the part of the goal the puck is getting scored into it.
Meaning, of all of the goal mouth opening , they only part that needs to be open is the part just big enough for the puck to pass through.
OK trick hockey math related question. I dont know if u know this but there is a relativity new pro league cwhl 6 teams mostly all canadain but there is 1 team in that league outta Boston.
Chris, Girls can totally rock hockey. I play recreationally these days, and there are not too many girls, but they come out and play in our league just fine.
This season, we have the wife of our team captain on defense, and she has been the most reliable in both positioning and physically challenging the on-coming pressure from our opponents.
I watch every game I can find when it comes to watching hockey. I especially like NHL and International play. Sadly, for women's hockey, that usually means I just get the Olympics and the occasionally televised Women's World Championships.
Sure, they don't hit like players in the NHL do, but they do hit. They also don't skate at the same speed that the NHL is played at.
But if that argument were truly a concern, how is it that NCAA men's basketball is popular? I like NCAA sports too, but anyone who argues that women's hockey of any kind at a semi-professional level is too slow, the I don't want to hear that person say they like any NCAA sport, for it is much slower then it's professional counter part.
A few years ago, my oldest daughter asked if she could learn to play hockey. I was really happy. Then she realized the puck could get her I tried to explain that she would have on pads, and that she would not feel too much of the impact.
She however remembered that I broke my foot 3 times playing hockey by blocking shots. She does not want to play. She likes to watch it still.
But I thought I had something going. How do I feel about girls in hockey? I feel there are not enough leagues and teams fostering our young women.
I would like to see a women's league that gets national attention. The state I live in has a few traveling women's leagues, but no one knows about them.
I would like to see a WNHL, but that seems pretty far off. I totally support anyone anywhere who wants to play hockey.
There should be no reason why anyone can't put a stick in their hand and play. Thank you Chris. I hope you stay with helping your boys and girls teams.
Managing and coaching teams can be a thankless activity. But if just one becomes passionate about hockey, they can spread it to others. Good luck.
Who knows, maybe your son s could be the next hockey all star generation. Oh wow thats crazy! Well thank you again for the info!
Larisa, price always varies based on age and equipment requirements. I would imagine peewee to cost a few hundred dollars as a minimum.
You can often find second hand stores to provide gloves, skates and some of the basic pads. Kids grow out of pads so fast that it may be better to just buy them used at first.
New pads could run you anywhere from to , especially as your player gets older. You will also need a chest pad, knee pads, helmet, elbow pads, gloves, and hockey pants.
I don't know the exact cost of youth pads as my children are not as enthusiastic as I am about hockey. I had to make the conscious choice not to force it.
Sigh, I can dream of them in the NHL. But they each have their own hobbies and passions. At least, I have taught them how to play hockey.
They know how to watch it. About the dangers of hockey; every competative contact sport has opportunity for injury.
Hockey allows checking in some leagues, but not all. I have yet to see a checking peewee league. I am sure there is one out there, but I have not actually seen one.
I would recommend if a team does not require a full face cage, get one anyway. Teeth cost too much to replace as a kid. The dangers in youth hockey would likely be high sticks to the face or neck, stray pucks, blocked shots which is how I have broken my foot , and inexperienced skaters accidentally hitting or skating into other players.
I find that the pads make the game incredibly safe. I have taken shots off my mask, knees, feet, and other pads. As players start younger, they learn how to avoid danger better.
I can't say there will be no risk, but I really think hockey is safer then football. Collisions do less damage to players then being dragged down in semi-defensless positions.
Football is fine, but I really think hockey is safer. Makes perfect sence now!.. Thank you for your wonderful explanation! My family is all about football i love football Raiders!
Also why is it so dangerous?? Larisa, I was very happy to see LA win last night. They deserved the win after such a strong playoff run.
To your questions; a check is the physical use of force or an object to impede the play or progress of another player. For example, a check can be applied by a player running into another.
This is the most typical type of check. So, when you see two players collide, and one player caused it on purpose, he "initiated" the check.
Most are legal. However, if you recall the first period where LA's Rob Scuderi 7 was checked from behind into the boards and ended up face down on the ice bleeding for a few minutes The call on the ice was "Boarding" and was assessed a 5 minute major penalty.
During this time, LA scored 3 goals and really put the game away. There are also other types of illegal checks such as cross checking, high sticking, and tripping.
Stick checking and lifting other player's sticks are legal, but if you slash, hook, or use excessive force with your stick, you will get a penalty for it.
Basically, a check can be as simple as poking someone or as violent as running into them and causing them to go flying through the air which can be legal if done in accordance with NHL rules.
The question about when to get youth into hockey for the first time is up to the kid and parents.
Many NHL players played Peewee hockey from 3 or 4 years old through high school. If you just want your kids to be good, or to have fun playing sports, then it is never too late to get involved in hockey.
Adults pick up the sport a little slower, but they still pick it up just the same. I would caution that if you get a child hooked on playing hockey, you may be committing yourself to an expensive sport.
I will not sugar coat the cost. My gear cost me enough that I questioned playing recreationally year over year. My wife says I am happier the rest of the week after a game regardless of a win or loss.
I guess I like the stress relief hockey gives me. I taught a few friends how to ice skate and roller blade by putting a hockey stick in their hands and pulled them into pick-up games.
When a new skater is focused on chasing the puck, and has a mild crutch to lean on for balance, the feet figure out how to stay under you.
It is really easy to teach someone how to skate for the first time when they are not focused on falling, and you give them a task to chase something.
Also i want to be a hockey mom when i have my kids.. How soon should i start involving him in this sport?
Also i must say my tteam LA Kings won last night which made mefall in love more with hockey!!! Ive learned so much by you, thanks for posting all this info!
My question is what do you mean by "checking" does it mean the same as in basketball? Emily, a line is basically the group of players that play together.
So the First Line, also known as the Top Line are your goal scorers and your players that may have been on the team the longest.
The First Line usually will start a game, but they do not have to. The coach can have any line start, and can play the lines in any order.
Basically, during the game, the coach just wants to be able to yell to his team, "Second Line, your next" and those players know that they will jump over the boards and onto the ice when the players on the ice start coming off the ice.
We hear about lines more from commentators and fans when significant players or strategies influence these lines.
He usually plays with the same players on the Top Line, but this past year, while one of the best centers on the team was recovering, Coach Hunter tried the Second Line center and the Third Line center on the first line.
That kind of thing. Fans like to hear when the Checking Line is on the ice. It may even be fun to know who these guys are. The checking line in Washington scores a good percent of goals each season.
They work hard, but their focus is to disrupt the playing style of opposing teams. They are out there trying to take advantage of mental mistakes from the other team.
Lines really are for the coach to be able to yell who should be on the ice in as little words as possible. Thanks so much - I starting watching NHL hockey this season, but I couldn't figure out some of the rules, and this helped a lot!
I also hear the term "line" thrown around a lot: "He went from being the center on the first line to being the winger on the third," stuff like that.
What does that mean? What's a line? Each team only has one time out per game. I have never seen a team try to call a second.
In NCAA Basketball, if a player tries to call a timeout after their last timeout, they get a technical foul. But I have never seen it in hockey. I will have to look into the rules.
I bet the refs just remind the team they can't take a second and then drop the puck for play to continue. Would any official really be asked to make inaccurate calls to boost ratings?
Just imagine the fallout if that ever was made public, if it were true. Phily beating the comeback of Sidney Crosby, and the all star roster of the Pittsburgh Penguins could easily be an argument that it is not credible conspiracy.
I have seen games that made me think of these claims. But I guess I just don't want to believe in them. It would mean my passion for the game is based on a lie and a flawed system.
It would mean I have put love and time into something fabricated. I believe it is an argument brought up when inconsistent calls are made.
So people start asking how calls can be made against one team but the same offense went uncalled against the other. This question becomes a theory that there must be intent and bias towards the team that benefited from the apparently one-sided officiating.
After watching enough of any sport, a viewer will undoubtedly find enough evidence to support this theory, making it fact in their mind, even if there is evidence to prove otherwise.
I don't want to spend too long talking about the ladder of inference. You should look it up. It is really a pretty interesting concept of how people take what they see around them and define their beliefs and their actions in accordance to this data.
But in short, people come up with how they feel officiating is run based on what they have seen. And if a conclusion is formed before enough data can be collected, someone can jump to the wrong conclusion.
For me, I have seen enough games that I can understand the frustration with officiating, but I also don't agree that it is rigged by ratings hungry executives.
Nor is it setup for teams to get more home games by extending a series to 7 games. I am sure the St. Louis market would love more money, but they are a single game away from getting swept out by LA.
Last year, Washington got swept by Tampa Bay in the second round. Detroit, one of the most faithful markets to their team had to watch as Nashville eliminated them quickly this year.
If there was a city in the country that could use revenue and marketing, it would have been Detroit. But they not only lost in the first round, but they lost quickly.
Wow, you can really tell how drunk I was looking back on some of the nonsense in those last posts. My bad After watching today's game myself and then reading some fans' reactions, I've noticed a pattern of conspiracy theories regarding the officiating in the playoffs.
It's implied that the forces that be want to keep big-ticket players and teams in it for popularity's sake. Even as a casual fan I remember this popping up all the time in the past, too.
Do you think all that talk is just sour grapes or can some fans legitimately argue that poorly-called playoff games are no accident? Hmm, an opportunist Thanks for the effort you made in your answers, I think I'm finally getting it.
I'll still be rooting for the Caps of course, and maybe Ovie will get to make some big contributions now that Hunter is giving him some time.
I really don't know why OV either can't or won't play more defense. I would speculate that he has learned that how he plays brings him success.
So I am guessing that what ever motivations he has, lack of defense has become his habit or style. I would doubt that any coach anywhere US, Canada, Russia, etc.
I play in an amateur league now, and my team is always yelling at each other to play more defense. I am curious if Alex would even answer that question straight.
When players are exposed for bad habits, sometimes they just deflect the question. After hearing some of his post game and post season interviews, he just says things like "we need to play better" or "We missed it.
I guess looking back at this comment, I remember in all sports growing up, there were always "lazier" players that would cherry pick all day, and that was it.
They were the ones at half court in basketball allowing a 5 on 4 down under basket. They were also the ones sitting on half field playing soccer.
They would have a good chance to score when the goalie could clear it out to him. In hockey, he is an opportunist. I see him the same way as a cherry picker.
But a good cherry pick play catches the defense unaware sometimes and can lead to great scoring chances. The problem is, they leave the defense stranded down a man.
And Lord knows wanting to avoid slapshots is understandable, especially after seeing how many D-men left the ice shaking their hands last night, haha Adhilde, because of how great you've been to me and others regarding timely and informative responses to our queries, and how deftly sensical your responses have been, I really respect you.
So please, please resist all present and future urges to get defensive regarding certain players or teams; not that you really have done so to this point, but to myself and others I think you're as close to an objective hockey source that we'll get, and I truly want to preserve that I still don't understand the anti-defense star culture.
It absolutely blows my mind that such a physical, results-based sport could kowtow to a "specialized" offensive skill set at the expense of effort on defense, especially when said offense isn't producing; again, it seems to me that all OV'd have to do is put forth the effort.
Not too much to ask You've admitted as much, that OV's offensive skills have been emphasized absolutely. Fair enough. I watch the NHL analysts describing his lackluster effort on the defensive end and wait for them to slam him, and yet they don't.
Like only caring about scoring is okay in a star forward's book. Am I right in that this cultural feature stands out like a sore thumb, or is there some hard-to-define logic to it all?
I know I'm missing something here; please help I don't know why But thank you for mentioning him your post. I don't think he wants to play defense.
But I could only guess that. If it is true, then I can only guess why. Many defensive players get serious injuries blocking shots.
Someone needs to ask him. I think defense before offensive is a better strategy, unless you were the Indianapolis Colts the year they won the Super Bowl.
For every point their defense gave up, their offense would get back quickly. For every stop their defense made, the offense would still score.
So, if you have a weak defense, you better have the best offense. Don't get me wrong when I defend OV. I don't think his style of play is good for most teams.
I don't even know if it right for Dale Hunter and the Capitals. I just argue that he has not changed. He has been the same Alex Ovechkin for as long as he has played hockey.
He was celebrated for it a few years back. But now, he is seen as a liability for it. I stress, I don't know what team can really build around a player such as him, but it sucks that fans and management were completely behind him.
And now it seems like no one wants to be. Before Backstrom got hurt this year, they were a very powerful duo. Because of Backstrom's ability to pass and get the puck to Alex, they were very hard to defend against.
I don't pretend to know what is best in Washington. And, to confirm your statement, the "Wizards-era Jordan" analogy doesn't compute at all IMO, for a few reasons, but most importantly: at that point, Jordan was a legend who was holding onto his own ghost on a mediocre team out of sheer competitiveness; with the Caps, OV is in his prime and surrounded by talent.
Adhilde, thanks for your honest feedback In my past, I've quickly attached to a certain player or team when discovering a new sport based on first impressions, emphasizing obvious skill and effort; I realize that this criteria is somewhat random, yet perfect and fair in that I'm judging favs the same way a very young, new fan would: first impressions.
Again, this seems random, but I used the same mind and methodology to pick Jimmie Johnson as my favorite NASCAR driver about ten years ago, so, seeing how that worked out, I trust my sports spectator instincts.
These same instincts tell me to push you on this topic. I sympathize with your "the player hasn't changed, just expectations" argument, as it's clear even to a noob like me that Washington has accrued a lot of talent recently and Holtby has been a great, positive surprise.
But to dismantle said argument, I point to the fact that all the reluctance to sacrifice offensive breakout positioning you say OV indulges in has resulted in an underwhelming year and playoffs, goal-wise, for him.
So his one-end style hasn't paid off this year from what I gather; the offensive output hasn't been making up for the lack of defense, thus degrading his value.
I know, I know, Dale Hunter has demanded a playoff-style, defense-first approach I'm looking for a "real talk" answer: Why can't OV just play defense or, again, any other offensive star I just read all about Alexei Yashin, ugh?
If the answer is essentially "He doesn't want to," then as "a newish fan" I have a huge problem with his respectability off the bat, which would be very disappointing since WAS has been "my team" based on those newbie instincts I referenced.
If this is the case, why would a team tolerate such resistance? Please spill your mind to your heart's content, and, if you can, convince me that OV is justified in his one-sided game.
In hockey, we do have many specialized players. But none as highly paid as OV. I have seen many players sell out completely for a team.
They play hard on D, and block shots. They will hurry to help the offensive rush, but be mindful to get back on D. I think it has been a topic of concern in Washington and across the league when a failed offensive surge ends with Ovechkin gliding back onto the Defensive side of the ice.
He has a lot of talent, there is no dispute there. I think what makes most analysts mad is that he seems to give up once the rush is over.
I have seen him in the defensive zone. When he knows that the defense is either out of position or late coming back, he steps up and defends hard.
Ovechkin has a specific style of play that boarders on reckless. I have not seen the Cup in Washington yet. As much as I want him to play harder, if he gets too far out of his position, then he won't be ready to break out of the defensive zone.
I am not defending that he is less mindful of defense. Years ago, when he got his huge contract, people were not sure how to play against Alex.
He was too big, and too explosive. In the past 2 years, teams have really figured out how to make him less of a factor. Also, he is the captain of the team.
That is voted on by the players. Alex Ovechkin is a bit one sided when it comes to hockey. But management knew that even when they agreed to pay him a lot.
Fans loved him, especially before he got figured out. And players respected him and still do for his speed and heaving hitting. So what has changed?
Not his style. Just our expectations. We want a cup. What is funny about the whole "one dimensional" play discussion is that most defenders are not criticized for not having an offensive mindset.
I want to see Washington win, but I don't think getting all over Alex Ovechkin will make a win appear before us.
I have played hockey for so many years. I could never even come close to the skill Alex has. As a player and fan, I feel Ovechkin is getting beaten up in the media and by fans for no reason other then impatience.
Micheal Jordan went to the Wizards and could not win a championship. He is arguably the most influential and possibly the best professional basketball player ever.
So, what did people say just before he retired in Washington? Did people blame him? Now, it is a hard comparison to make, but I feel OV is playing hard.
He is playing his game. I bet he hates losing as much as the fans hate watching a loss. No star athlete feels successful until they have a trophy to show for it.
I don't mind that Ovechkin is up front more then he is back. The gamble can pay off with high percentage chances to score.
Thanks for your comments; they were indeed helpful though I certainly wouldn't have minded the "book's worth" of team descriptions you wrote, and I implore you to post 'em if you still got 'em.
I have yet another question. I've been watching each and every game on the NBC networks, playing the hell out of NHL 12 on my xbox, and regularly checking out sites like prohockeytalk.
So, like everyone else, I've been inundated with talk and speculation over Ovechkin's playing time. Thus, my question is about player specialization.
It seems to me that while other sports have strictly specialized positions, hockey, with its tough, physical, and utterly team-oriented game, would place a premium on "two-way talent" I simply do not understand this.
What the hell is stopping him or any other "skill" player? In virtually any sport, good defensive play is largely the product of effort and willing physicality, not just specialized talent.
I've seen Ovechkin hit people, and hard; he can be a physically overwhelming player except when he tried to check Chara recently, yikes. He's not an idiot, he's able-bodied, he's well-compensated, and all this drama could be laid to rest if he'd only "D-up" Thanks again.
I will address fighting first. That is always a hot topic in hockey. Most leagues fine and suspend players that fight. The NHL has not stamped out fighting because of it's historic roots in the game.
The team General Managers and NHL Commissioner get together every year and talk about how the sport effects their team, fans, and budgets.
It seems that fighting comes up almost every year. The NHL keeps fighting every time. Some years, they come up with different penalties such as off ice fines.
One year, they had in their TV contract that the fights would not be allowed to be televised. For what ever reasons they give each year, fighting is still in the game as a release of frustration.
Call consistency is what every sport wants. I don't think any sport plays games with a looming perception that the officials are going to favor a specific team.
In most sports both national and international, if an official can be held on proof of bias and his or her calls reflect that bias, they are fired and sometimes fined.
I don't like bad calls. But I don't like inconsistency more. I can take bad calls as long as bad calls are getting called both ways.
But it does make me upset when the team I am supporting gets hit with a high stick with no call, and then gets called for a very minor that could not have been called.
Bad calls and inconsistent calls will happen. That is the human element of sports officiating. I had a college professor that introduced the grading scale for a test.
When someone asked him about a curve and his policy on "arguing" questions for more points, he had a unique response that has stuck with me.
My teacher pointed out that people never come to him when he accidentally gives too much credit or too many points when he makes an error in the student's favor.
But you know they will be beating down his door for the 1 point he took away that the student should have had. His point was that people make mistakes both ways, and the result could even out over time.
But we don't like being wronged, so we insist on the fix to our wrong but fail to fix it when it benefits us positively.
My point is, bad calls should even out as long as there is consistency. And in the lack of consistency, you should hope your team you are cheering for can run up the score before the officials can have a significant impact on the game.
Lastly, you mentioned having profesional analysts look at the fundamentals of the game. The funny thing is, most of the analysts are former hockey players and coachees.
They grew up playing the game, and they will probably want to keep the game as it is. Hockey still has some what of a cult following.
The idea behind the icing rule is that flipping the puck all the way down the end of the ice then chasing after it takes away from the flow of the game.
The officials needed a way to stop players from doing this. So they made a rule where you are not allowed to pass the puck to the far side of the rink, pass the red goal line from your side of the center ice line known as the Red Line.
When icing is called by the referee the offending team is penalized. The do not get a penalty as this is a lesser evil. The sanction imposed is that the offending team has a faceoff in their own end, near their goalie.
This can lead to a dangerous situation if the other team happens to win this faceoff the may get a great scoring chance. The icing hockey rules have been modified somewhat a few years ago.
Team always look for loopholes in the rules and what they used to do was whenever a few players got tired they would ice the puck this would be the verb for icing so that they could go to the bench and have another player take their spot.
The new rule now states that if a team ices the puck they do not have the ability to swap out any players. Everyone must stay on the ice except in the case of injury.
There are a few tidbits about icing that are worth noting. When a team is short one player due to a penalty being served they are allowed to ice the puck without any repercussions.
At times a team will seemingly ice the puck but the official chooses to not blow his whistle. This happens when it is deemed that a defensive player could have reached the puck before it crossed the red line.
This also goes to the flow of the game, the defender should play the puck when he can. This is a judgement call by the linesmen.The goal behind the DEL was Android Apps Download create a league, based on the model of the North American NHLin which the teams could play consistently without relegation concerns and create a stable league. Meistverkauft in Sachbücher Alle ansehen. Kristian Klaus. Start a Wiki. Stückzahl: 1 2. Das könnte Ihnen auch Cash Free.